Logan's Run and Zardoz:
Inverse Dystopias
Author: Patrick
M. Tilton.
Within a year or so of each other, two
interesting cinematic views of the future were presented on the big screen:
ZARDOZ (in 1974, if I'm not mistaken), and LOGAN'S RUN (in 1975). After
pondering the plots and themes of each movie, recently, it dawned on me that
each one was almost a mirror-image of the other. In ZARDOZ, we have a society
of Immortals who have closed themselves off from the rest of the world in
places called a "Vortex" (there being more than one of these "Vortexes"
[Vortices?] on Earth). Each "Vortex" is protected from the savage
outlying areas by a forcefield called a "Periphery Shield".
The people who inhabit the Vortex seen in the
movie are immortal; that is, at the end of the 20th Century (presumably) they
had been a group of "intelligentsia" who had discovered a
"cure" for death, and had "taken" that cure, so that their
bodies ceased to age, keeping them "ever-young". Of course, there are
those in this society who have transgressed the "rules" and have been
punished by being "aged" months or years... yet never to the point of
death itself. Such persons are eventually doomed to be "Renegades",
living purposeless lives of senility. Every time a person in this society commits
suicide, the "Tabernacle" which runs things (a sort of intelligent
computer--with a soothing male voice) genetically cooks-up a cloned body of the
suicide, transplants all of his/her memories back into the newly-made body (which
has been quick-aged back to the "age" level it had been prior to the
suicide), and the "immortal" who had tried to kill himself/herself is
thus doomed to continue living on and on and on and on... with no escape from life
possible -- since each member had allowed the Tabernacle to prevent them from
"remembering" how to reverse the immortalization process. In order
for this society to be "stable", it must not allow itself to breed,
since an ever-growing population would be unsustainable. By making themselves
Immortal, they've also somehow removed the ability to sleep (sleep and death
being "linked" somehow, not only physically but
"mythically"/poetically), and to have sex. The males in the society
of Eternals are effeminate, infertile, and incapable of spontaneous erection.
The population level of the Vortex has changed not one bit in several centuries
(by the time the movie commences), although many of the "inmates" of
this prison-like society have been hyper-aged to senility as "Renegades"...
including the man who FOUNDED the society, having discovered the
"cure" for death and then allowed the Tabernacle to remove his knowledge
of how to reverse the procedure.
The "hero" of the film is a
genetically-engineered (i.e. selectively-bred) "mutant" from the
Brutal outside-world. In a bizarre "show-down" with the
"intelligent computer" Tabernacle (which sees itself as the
"god" of the Immortals, since It is the sum-total of all their knowledge),
Zed -- the Hero -- acquires the ability to bring death to these
"immortal" people. The name, Zed, is the British equivalent of the
last letter of the English alphabet (what Americans call "zee"); as
such, it is also the equivalent of the Greek letter "Omega", an
epithet of Christ as the Last Judgment's "judge"--Christ is called,
in REVELATION, the "Alpha and the Omega", the beginning and the end. Zed,
as an inverse-messiah, is able to penetrate the "periphery shield" of
the Vortex, conquer the "god"-computer ("Tabernacle") which
controls the immortalization process that has doomed the Eternals (who have
long since longed for death, after having lived enough to have done whatever
their spirits have desired to do), and bring death to people who (up until that
point) were doomed to immortality.
This movie dares to put forward a theory that
the basic assumption of religion is FALSE: that is, that man is afraid of death,
yet subject to it (being a mortal creature), and can ONLY escape the inevitability
of death by the intervention of a Christ-Messiah whose resurrection from death
affords those for whom he died the ability to be resurrected in turn to
immortal life. The assumption of religion (that is, of Christian religion), is that
the human spirit will be able to endure unending life, IF that condition can be
brought about... but WHAT IF that assumption is false?
The film ZARDOZ dares to suggest that the human
spirit can only endure so much life... and that an indefinitely prolonged
existence would become unbearable. The "immortals" of the film, after
only 3 centuries (or so) of "eternity", have been made latently
psychotic by their unrealizable need for death. The hero is Zed (the
"last"), an Exterminator from the outside world of
"Brutals"... a selectively-bred killer who enjoys a relatively higher
status out in the savage lands, killing and raping in the name of a false god
imposed on the Brutals by one of the Eternals (the one "in charge
of" the Outside), a "Merlin-like" magician/sleight-of-hand
artist named Arthur Frayn. The false god is a giant stone head with a horrific
grimace, which flies around from Vortex to Vortex, commanding the Exterminators
to use the guns it provides to kill "the Brutals who multiply and are legion".
The gun (which is "good" because it shoots death) is compared to the
penis (which is "evil" because it shoots seed to create new life) by
the booming voice of the "god" Zardoz.
Both this film, ZARDOZ, and the other dystopian
cinematic vision of the future -- LOGAN'S RUN -- deal with society as a messed-up
"utopia" designed (in part) to deal with the problem of overpopulation.
A previous film, SOYLENT GREEN, also dealt with this, suggesting that society
ultimately will cannibalize itself if it allows the population to exceed a
theoretical "sustainable" limit.
In LOGAN'S RUN, the society of the City of
Domes is cut off from the Outside World (the soothing female-voiced computer
refers to the "city seals" which Logan must breach to go on his
mission). Rather than a society of undying Immortals (as in ZARDOZ) who cannot avoid
death, the city is populated by generation-after-generation of "Breeder"
- bred people who aren't allowed to live beyond a limiting age (30 years; in
the book, of course, the mandatory death-age is 21, a symbol of adulthood and maturity -- as
in the number of chapters of Anthony Burgess' novel "A Clockwork
Orange"). The citizens, once they reach their "Lastday",
participate in a public pseudo-religious ceremony called "Carrousel",
where an anti-gravity field draws up a batch of 30-year-olds towards their
"Renewal"... which is actually no more than a giant "bug zapper",
killing them off so that the population remains stable. Yet the belief has been
instilled amongst the population that each "flame out" in Carrousel
results in a form of reincarnation: the "Renewal" as a reborn infant
in the nursery. This perceived cycle of Life-Death-Renewal is physically
portrayed (in metaphor) by the rotating circular platform in the Carrousel
chamber: as it goes round & round, each Lastday citizen soars upwards to
the crystal and gets "flamed" out of existence... and each newborn
child (in nursery) has a similar crystal implanted in one of its palms,
starting out "crystal clear" before going through the cycles of
Blue... Yellow... Green... and Red... ultimately ending with the blinking
Red-Black-Red-Black of Lastday.
Similarly, in ZARDOZ, a crystal plays an
important part in the plot: each immortal citizen has had a tiny crystal
implanted in their forehead, which "links" them to the Tabernacle
(which, ultimately, is just one large crystal, which Zed holds in the palm of
his hand) by refracting lightrays produced by their very thoughts and directing
them towards the Tabernacle crystal (which uses those thought-produced photons
to re-constitute the memories of those who try to escape life by committing
suicide, "shining" those memory-rays back into the implanted crystals
re-refracted into their newly-cloned body's brain).
Interestingly, these two uses of crystals (in
ZARDOZ, in the forehead, and in LOGAN'S RUN in the palm of the hand) seems to
echo two passages in the book of REVELATION:
"Also it [a "Beast" which rose
out of the earth] causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both
free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one
can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the Beast or the number
of its name" (13:16-17)
"Then I saw thrones, and seated on them
were those to whom judgment was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who
had been beheaded for their testimony to Jesus and for the word of God, and who
had not worshiped the Beast or its Image and had not received its mark on their
foreheads or their hands" (20:4)
Each society (in ZARDOZ and LOGAN'S RUN) is,
perhaps, meant to be thought of as equivalent to the allegorical
"Beast" of REVELATION, which has "marked" each citizen either
in the FOREHEAD (Zardoz) or inthe HAND (Logan's Run). Granted, the crystal in
Logan's palm is in his LEFT hand, and not the RIGHT one (as in REV. 13:16), but
in the original book, the crystal palmflower is in his RIGHT hand. The
"Beast", then, is a symbol for a CORRUPT SOCIETY, which has institutionalized
either DEATH (Logan's Run) or a non-divine ETERNAL LIFE (Zardoz) from which the
people cannot escape... until a hero defeats the computer which controls it. In
ZARDOZ, Zed defeats the Tabernacle (destroying the Periphery Shield and
bringing the false god Zardoz [the stone Head] crashing down), and in LOGAN'S
RUN, Logan defeats the computer (and brings the city to a fiery end)... bringing
back the concepts of "Mother" and "Father" bearing/begetting
"Children"… the way things are "supposed" to be.
LOGAN'S RUN fans should check out ZARDOZ, which
was every bit as much of a "trip" for movie-goers in the early-to-mid
1970's as "LR" was. I highly recommend it!
Zardoz: Revolution in
the 24th Century
Author: Barb/Chessripley.
Come on people! You want bizarre? Go see
"Eraserhead," or "Crash." This flick's ("Zardoz")
deep and I'm looking for reassurance that I joined the right group here.
Anyone over 30 here? Anyone ever read a book? "The
Matrix" owes more than just a few ideas to "Zardoz." So do Dan Simmons' first two
"Hyperion" books, which owe more than just a few.
It seemed to me that "Zardoz" was a
powerful and sobering statement about the importance of death and the horror/hell
that (one form of) immortality can be. The older I get and the more technology
we get exposed to in our society, the more I find that I can understand this
movie. This movie was so far ahead of its time it's almost eerie.
I guess what makes it bizarre or silly to you
folks is the naked titties and the lack of fancy computer generated special
effects. Or perhaps the pointless intro by Arthur, attempting to explain to
people who can't think and don't read, what the movie was about.
These idiot cult people (the 'Vortex' folks) in
the past (I get the sense it would have only been a couple decades beyond our
current time.) decided to adopt immortality through very unconventional
means.
As the world went to sh*t around them, they
adopted a utopian lifestyle by allowing themselves to become enslaved by a
computer, the 'Tabernacle." They agreed to wall themselves from the rest
of mankind, accepted the crystal implants and went about their lives. They
voluntarily removed the memory of the essential details of the computer from
themselves, lest they become bored with immortality and destroy their utopia. When
their bodies wore out or were killed, the computer (which had all of their
downloaded memories and personalities from the crystal implants) would clone
new bodies and they would thus become immortal. All of this is explained in the
beginning/middle, but you do not see the crystal implant scene or the re-born Arthur
until near the end.
Except immortality IS boring and surely life
isn't all that worth living if we don't have to fear death. Look at the
Apathetics. Either they have lived too long OR, they have been re-born into
clone bodies too many times (VERY similar to the "Bikura illness" in
Simmons' "Hyperion" novel) and are becoming a bit mentally retarded
from all the duplications. Everyone else is already sexuality-less.
Also, what the f_ _k has that Tabernacle
computer done to these poor cult people after multiple rebirths?!? After all it
is 2293, so they've all had a few re-clonings over the years. I mean the men
are all wimpy, underdeveloped, effeminate and unable to achieve an erection. The
women are all flat-chested and not interested in sex or masculine men. Also
they find watching Zed's downloaded memories of violence to be almost sexually
stimulating. Not quite tho. Truly pathetic.
Arthur, the magician, is a genius as has never
been seen on Earth before. He has been planning for decades, if not centuries, working
towards his plan. He has been BREEDING the primitive outsiders in order to
achieve Zed. He wants to die and knows that the only way to defeat the Master
of them all (the computer) is to bring in a mentally and physically superior
outsider in order to find and destroy the Tabernacle.
I thought Zed's destruction of the computer was
a little weird. He found the flaw at the center of the crystal and that
collapsed the Tabernacle (the Vortex walls fell and the primitive outsiders
headed in "to kill for Zardoz"). I almost got the sense that it was a
Captain Kirk ala Star Trek computer destruction.
The Tabernacle panicked when Zed figured out
that it had decided to store itself in the big diamond (extended pause followed
by, "You hold me in the palm of your hand."). Zed projected his consciousness
inside the diamond. They (Zed and Tabernacle) appeared to have a battle of
wills where Zed won by (among other things) having the knowledge that all the
women he inseminated gave to him. I found this part a bit difficult to
interpret.
Zed is so new, so physically and mentally
superior that he can stimulate the Apathetics into wakefulness (sharing of the
tears scene). He IS the giant question mark on the evolutionary chart featured
in the beginning when he is exploring May's area. Zed has brought to the Vortex
what almost all of them have been craving on one level or another, DEATH. A
death that does not involve reawakening in a new cloned body, still enslaved to
the f_ _ _ ing computer! Halleluah, Zed is arrived!
Also, some of the women who don't want to die
but who want to be free still seem to have their courses (that's menstrual
periods to those who are not literate - as to why they have periods who knows
since they cannot reproduce and aren't even interested in sex) so they can take
Zed's seed, escape the hellish Vortex, and start anew without the Tabernacle.
My husband and I just nodded and smiled together
with a tear in our eyes (okay more than one for me) at the end scene. Zed and
Consuella (is it Consuella?) have escaped and started the new generation. The
Earth's natural order is back in balance. They both age normally! I thought she
would not, but the fact that she does just proves that their
"immortality" was perverted by the cult and the Tabernacle (multiple
downloaded-memory cloned-body rebirths).
Not only do they age normally but she is what
stimulated ERECTION in Zed. Yes! Getting back to normalcy. She gets pregnant, they have a son and he
matures. As is normal, he leaves the family nest (she tries to hold him back
but cannot - at least her returning hand is met by Zed's and she is comforted).
They AGE. They DIE. They ROT. They DISSOLVE into bones. The bones turn to DUST.
And what remains? Only the most primitive, the very first artwork; first made
endless tens of thousands of years ago and found among the Aborigines of
Australia. The handprint made in what is now the 24th century.
Nature, Earth, and humanity (including our
psyches) are brought back into the natural balance.
Phew.
That's my (believe me brief) take on the movie
"Zardoz", and why it is NOT weird, but in fact deep and profound.
TO BE UPDATED WITH MORE CONTENT
Fascinating essay with plenty of interesting observations, thanks for sharing it!
ReplyDeleteIndeed, both films share an underlying theme, although I think that ZARDOZ has aged better than LOGAN'S RUN, one of the reasons being that it makes more sense (how the comfort-conditioned adolescent community in LOGAN'S RUN could possibly survive in the aftermath, especially given Jessica 5's horror to eat real food / fish, still puzzles me up to this day).
ZARDOZ provides a great antithesis to the romantic notion that the mythological "Fountain of Youth" is a good thing in itself, but where I reserve scepticism is the generalization, that an indefinitely prolonged existence would become unbearable (of course, since I didn't yet have the privilege of enjoying it - unless I'm just unable to remember my previous re-incarnations - I lack the experience to be a reliable "witness" - LOL).
Obviously, it has become unbearable for the "Eternal" characters in the Vortex which are tantalized by the endless repetition of shallow rituals and oppressed to submit themselves to absolute conformism within this closed community, where any digression is immediately punished.
Supposedly artists, I did not see one original work (Frayn merely imitated Magritte's Castle in the Pyrenees and used it as a blueprint for the flying stonehead idea) and although they secured all the art treasures of the world, these apparently have no value to them (again, Boorman "light years" ahead of his time, illustrating art collectors that hide the great works in safes) considering the destruction orgy they unleash later onto the storehouse and the "old fossiles".
While the Vortex architects may have been too conditioned to mortality, their offspring obviously was too conditioned to collectivism and the evils that came from that.
Interestingly, once the Tabernacle has been destroyed, the Vortex people re-discover their ability of free will. Most of them want to die (including the oracle Avalow), others, namely May and her followers, want to continue and give birth to Zed's children.
Thus, the way I see it, ZARDOZ is pro-death and pro-life, or simply that the natural order of things is best.
Good insight, Frank.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, ONE MORE ESSAY has been inserted. Check it out.
@ Barb/Chessripley
ReplyDeleteIt seems you are addressing the issue that "a receiver must be like a transmitter" because I think that what Hollywood is increasingly "transmitting" since the late 90's is mostly spectacle and gladiator games and, whether we like it or not, has shaped the new audiences (the "receivers") and how they appreciate and react to certain films.
Reading the novelization for ZARDOZ contributes to a better understanding of the story (much like it does for 2001), but I would find it hard to disagree with moviegoers that would expect any film to be rather self-explanatory. And last but not least it is a "what if" scenario that many can't relate to, unless future generations might face the choice of having prolonged lives at the expense of having children. I believe it's a theme that doesn't concern many of us, yet.
The wall painting in Arthur Frayn's room, showing the evolution of man and featuring a "?" after "Eternal" is somewhat symptomatic for the difficulties most audiences apparently have when watching the film (and most ironic, I should add). Only later do we learn that there is no prospect for the next step in evolution (because the Eternals cannot procreate), thus it's a clever and early hint that Arthur is experimenting with genetic breeding, but the message only becomes clear after the first viewing.
The Wachowskis avoided such pitfalls with the MATRIX (the more I think about it the more I'm beginning to suspect that this infamous brick wall they were looking at when they received the inspiration for the MATRIX featured a poster of ZARDOZ - LOL) by making Morpheus give Neo (aka the audience) a lecture / explanation of the context / setting just before it got too confusing. In ZARDOZ it's mostly flashbacks and rather (too) late in the story, IMHO.
And by the way, the handprint in the stonehead is Arthur Frayn's (Boorman considered this character to be his alter ego and the handprint consequently is Boorman's), the novelization is very clear about this in its early beginning. Thus, nailing his Webley-Fosbery revolver to the wall next to it, is apparently Zed's symbolic comment that the age of Zardoz Terror is over.
While I think it is the overtly 70's nature of ZARDOZ that turns potential viewers away, I concur that there are quite a few truly intelligent ideas roaming through the fabric of it's story, the least of which is the negative commentary on the current generation (as most prophetic science fiction stories tend to do).
ReplyDeleteImmortality only became a prison due to boredom - if the immortals continued on the industrialization of human kind (ie space travel, architecture, art, etc), there would be no boredom and thus no wish for death. Yet we can see even today how people are turning away from technological advancements in terms of "manifest destiny", space travel and the more typical aspects of said "progess".
Instead, the only technology that seems to evolve is that which involves communication and entertainment - that which pacify and occupy our minds. For as much access to information as people have, did anyone see Jimmy Kimmel's "man on the street" skit, where people were asked questions after seeing the film of Martin Luthor King speaking at Selma? Some people mentioned that he was a bit overweight and needed to go on a diet (not even realizing he had been dead for decades).
I guess you can say that the real critique behind LOGAN'S RUN and ZARDOZ is that we as a species are doomed to failure as long as we continue to act like children and focus purely on ourselves as opposed to what our potential (and it's results) can be.
Andrew Bazylevsky...Rewbaz
ReplyDelete